• An international contractor’s arbitration involving a $100 million dispute arising out of a cost reimbursable contract for the construction of a portion of a transcontinental oil pipeline;
  • An ENR Top 10 civil contractor’s construction of a $90 million hydro-electric power generation plant and related claims by and against a public utility in the Southwestern U.S.;
  • Successful arbitration in Denmark regarding alleged cost overruns on an EPC Contract for a refinery constructed for Statoil A/S, the Danish subsidiary of the Norwegian state-owned oil company;
  • A general contractor’s claims and disputes in connection with the rehabilitation and modernization of a waste water treatment plant serving a population of over 22,000 in Western Virginia;
  • An ENR Top 15 international contractor’s $50 Million dispute involving an offshore natural gas drilling platform and sub-sea pipeline project in the North Atlantic;
  • Resolution of a contractor’s claim in Arizona state court arising out of the construction of a co-generation facility;
  • Heavy civil contractor’s injunction against municipality and preventing performance on a major water treatment plant project funded by the 2009 “Stimulus Act”;
  • A mechanical subcontractor’s $18 Million claim against a general contractor on a combined cycle power plant;
  • Resolution for a major international contractor of construction disputes from the construction of a $100 million gas pipeline project in South America;
  • Represented an international contractor against claims and disputes arising from new construction and renovation of an electric power plant in Croatia;
  • Arbitration for a major contractor of a $20 Million dispute from the construction of an electric generating peaking facility in Virginia;
  • Litigation for a major mechanical/electrical contracting group in disputes totaling over $35 million for the construction of three combined cycle power plant projects in New England;
  • Special counsel to a public utility company for a prudency hearing before a state public utilities commission in connection with expert testimony regarding the underlying reasons for costs and schedule increases on a nuclear power plant project;
  • Litigation for a major mid-western corporation over the construction of electrostatic precipitators for a public utility involving claims for delays, disruption and loss of labor efficiency;
  • Representation of the prime contractor in construction of nuclear power plant facilities in Hanford, Washington.